• Today Link (navigate back to today’s date)
• Year navigation, jump to ’10 or back to ’08 in the active month
• Ability to click a day cell or day link and fire your own custom logic (i.e. add event on that day)
• JSON date parsing, parse what some from that event object if the calendar is un-aware.
• Fixed in-line sizing, configurable by options conscruct
• Deprecating Date property, replaced by StartDate
• Added EndDate property to event object

While not all of all of them seem flashy, the last three or four points make the calendar that much closer to having multi-day events and event overflow support.

I am happy to report that I am currently using the calendar on an ASP.Net MVC site on my development machine.  I hope to have a new calendaring system ready soon.  This should concern you only because when I find issues while developing and using it, I fix them and everyone benefits.  In more detail my calendar does a JSON GetData call to a controller actions, which executes and returns JSON formatted events.  I am using James Newton-King’s JSON.Net library to map and serialize my C# objects.  I use the attributes on my properties to rename or exclude them from serialization.  Very nice library and commend James for the work.

I really like this idea of have Areas or Modules in ASP.Net MVC.  I have been in the process of developing a Forum for a website and came across this after I was complete.  I thought that “yes it would be nice to use this same logic in another application”, and having an areas or module to move around would be quite nice.

One thing I would expand upon is the idea of creating a self contained binary (dll) that can be referenced into the main project.  This would mean that all the views and resources would have to be staticly defined in the binary, but could be easily re-styled with CSS.  You’d probably also have to define a configuration element in your web.config that defines database connections and other information important/configurable to the Module/Area.

We’ll see how time permits for a prototype.  Not something I need now but is cool to think of.  I wish the ASP.Net MVC guys/gals would include this functionality of segragated sections/areas/modules in a future release of ASP.Net MVC

The biggest factor in deciding the re-architect the site at the time was the lack of interoperability in the Admin side/application.  It worked as intended about 60% of the time (60% of the time it works every time).  The web forms admin side required a lot of code that was spread out over numerous code behind files, making it difficult to maintain.  Not to mention similar logic was being duplicated, violating the DRY principal (don’t repeat yourself).

Around the same time I had just finished my exploration of the new ASP.Net MVC (model-view-controller) model and had fallen in love with web development all over again.  I had been in the process of creating some sample applications with it.  I even started testing how it deployed on various web hosting platforms.  I discovered that the MVC pattern DID work on IIS6 and IIS7.  The URL’s on IIS6 required special mapping (either adding .aspx or .mvc to map to the aspnet framework), I didn’t like that so I found a host that offered IIS7.  The URL’s are now clean and to my liking.  MVC makes sense, it creates clean separation of UI, business logic and data models. and will be an architecture of choice on ASP.Net.

So to make my long story short and to the point.  I ended up re-architecting the Admin (once web forms side) of my site/project into a new MVC project in my solution.  I started bringing over functionality one peice at a time, while reworking the underlying business logic and data access logic into various providers and repositories.  I had everything working perfectly for a phase one deployment to the web host.  I had 2 projects to deploy, one public facing site (web forms) and one admin MVC site.  I set up the web host to use a virtual directory for the the MVC site, configured my connection strings as:

    <connectionStrings>
    <!-- PRD -->
    <add name="PertNear.Data.Properties.Settings.PertNearSandstoneConnectionString"
connectionString="server=secureserver.net;uid=user;pwd=pass;database=db"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>
    <add name="PertNear.Membership"
connectionString="server=secureserver.net;uid=user;pwd=pass;database=db"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
 
    <!--
    <!--  DEV
    <add name="PertNear.Data.Properties.Settings.PertNearSandstoneConnectionString"
connectionString="Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=DB;Integrated Security=True"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
    <add name="PertNear.Membership"
connectionString="Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=DB;Integrated Security=True"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
    -->
    </connectionStrings>

I uploaded everything to the virtual directory and tried to access the new applications. The public facing side (web forms) worked cause it had a separate config file, the admin side through the generic IIS7 internal server error with no messages. I looked everywhere to find a solution. Many sources said to add a wrapping element around the parent web.config so that it’s settings don’t conflict with the virtual directories (inheritance in IIS7 config files). I spent a week plus on this issue until I ran the config file through an XML validator. As you can see I had a rouge comment tag in the config. Had I known that IIS7 was first validating my config file I might have gotten an error along the lines of “invalid xml” instead of generic 500 error.

Reader be warned, be sure the validate the web.config file before uploading. And check the config file before you make any drastic changes like I did (I moved the MVC project into the public facing site to now have just one project to deploy, thinking that might solve the issue). One point worth mentioning, I had edited my published web.config outside of VS2008 in a text editor, hopefully VS would have caught that error for me had I known.

Good luck, happy coding and avoid the frustration I had.